


françois 1er - christian-jaque
yeah it's on vimeo....but no subs. there's a version on kg with subs but it's really shitty quality compared to the vimeo one. subs for that are totally out of sync with vimeo tho so just sort of tiled vimeo and kg subs and watched, read and scrolled as appropriate. not ideal way to watch but there's not a great deal of dialogue so it wasn't too bad
glad you enjoyed it but aaaaargh, how many times on this forum do i have to keep yelling about j c mol??? not sure what painleve contributed to the evil eye but mol's contribution is UNMISTAKABLESt. Gloede wrote: ↑Tue Dec 20, 2022 10:23 pm co-driven by the marvelous effects created by Jean Painlevé.
The power-pairing of Dekeukeleire and Painlevé makes this a must-see in itself!
i already yelled at rischka about the same thingSt. Gloede wrote: ↑Tue Dec 20, 2022 11:23 pm Mainly excluded Mol as I have never heard the name before
In this article, the example of the Dutch science filmmaker Jan Cornelis Mol (1891-1954) offers the point of departure for a general reflection on the history of experimental cinema and the meanings of aesthetic experience and imagination in documentary representation, film theories, and the avant-garde manifestos of the 1920s. Mol's films illuminate the fascination with space-time abstraction and visualised rhythm that unifies the practice of science film and avant-garde cinema in that era. Mol's work in the 1920s—films classified as amateur, science, educational, industrial, and avant-garde—is a remarkably broad representation of the multiple facets of experimental cinema.
Thank you for the resources, will give these a look.sally wrote: ↑Wed Dec 21, 2022 11:21 am anyway, some basic info: https://filmdatabase.eyefilm.nl/en/coll ... son/jc-mol
more of his films held by EYE:
https://www.youtube.com/@eyefilmNL/sear ... 20c.%20mol
the most indepth article i managed to find:
https://academic.oup.com/screen/article ... 73/1669754
and the talk where i learnt about his japanese internment:
https://youtu.be/15rBvmYgsIY
Yeah, I thought this one was a bit flat, and by far the least interesting film I've seen with Zarah Leander (whom I adore!).