The Makioka Sisters (1983) vs. Requiem for a Heavyweight (1962)

User avatar
Brotherdeacon
Posts: 62
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:24 am
Location: Los Angeles

Re: The Makioka Sisters (1983) vs. Requiem for a Heavyweight (1962)

Post by Brotherdeacon »

x1983 Two very good films, both at almost polar opposites of the narrative range of drama. Rod Sterling's screenplay is deservedly the stuff of TV legend, but I think Ichikawa's Sisters was something only a great director could have pulled-off from a 500 plus page novel--certainly one of the greatest novels of Japan's twentieth century--though using a necessarily chopped, clipped and truncated enactment for theatrical release, it still vibrates clearly along delicate notes of cinematic grandeur and truth, tradition and a 1000 year-old epilogue of that tradition.
:lboxd: :imdb: brotherdeacon
Lencho of the Apes
Posts: 1881
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:38 am

Post by Lencho of the Apes »

x1983

I have to go with the Tapioca Sisters for this one, even with the postcard sunsets and the mushy montages. Requiem was one of those self-consciously 'realistic' early 60s joints, like The Pawnbroker or A Hatful Of Rain ('57), that get a little on my nerves for their earnest heavyhandedness.

On the other hand, even with 'realistic' performances,' everything in Makioka had an emblematic significance, relating to the characters' position within the trad. Imperial culture or to how quickly/how thoroughly they would come to adapt to modern postwar conditions; image-clusters relating to expensive kimonos, fetishized Japans landscape iconography, architecture etc... mapped out the contours (and the fixed, unpassable boundaries) of the traditional culture that was fading away and leaving the girls adrift.
The opposite of 'reify' is... ?
ItsUhhMee
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2019 10:28 pm
Location: S. of the Atlantic, N. of the Mississippi

Post by ItsUhhMee »

Lencho_of_the_Apes wrote: Wed Mar 06, 2019 3:44 pm
Requiem was one of those self-consciously 'realistic' early 60s joints, like The Pawnbroker or A Hatful Of Rain ('57), that get a little on my nerves for their earnest heavyhandedness.

I get this feeling you are going to HATE my first choice for 1965. :lol: We shall see shortly, I suppose. I guess it's just those types of films that I feel the most gravitated toward.
Lencho of the Apes
Posts: 1881
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:38 am

Post by Lencho of the Apes »

ItsUhhMee wrote: Thu Mar 07, 2019 3:53 am
my first choice for 1965.
Up toward 1965, you start seeing that kind of ""realism" applied to crassly genre-based (and even "exploito") narratives. Those are kinda lovable.
The opposite of 'reify' is... ?
---
Site Admin
Posts: 2136
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 1:30 am

Post by --- »

Voting closed! Requiem for a Heavyweight (1962) wins!
User avatar
karl
Posts: 379
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 3:39 pm

Post by karl »

Darn, forgot to vote! We were half an hour from the end of Makioka Sisters when the missus just got too sleepy (it's a long movie from a long book), so we put off the end for today, and now vote's over. Anyway it's one of the rare late Ichikawa films I really enjoyed. Took awhile to warm to it, cos like the book it just sorta throws you into the middle of the Makioka world and it takes awhile to figure out who's who, and, as in American films of the same period, the actors aren't really believable as historical figures - something about the look and movements about people raised on television. Would've been a tough call, especially since I'm quite fond of Anthony Quinn and his movie.
How small of all that human hearts endure,
That part which laws or kings can cause or cure. - Johnson
thecinephile

Post by thecinephile »

rischka wrote: Thu Feb 21, 2019 11:51 am i sent you the password so i hope you have it now (same as the old password)

Could you also send me the password for the resources folder.
User avatar
sally
Posts: 3587
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 8:11 pm

Post by sally »

should probably post a bit more before requesting things like this?
thecinephile

Post by thecinephile »

sally wrote: Thu Sep 14, 2023 12:34 pm should probably post a bit more before requesting things like this?
Yeah sorry
Post Reply