samanishvili’s stepmother - kote mardjanishvili, zakaria berishvili (1926)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ttuq3xwXPi0
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/xelvls7.png)
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/pYk0Rys.png)
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/vMy4sGV.png)
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/x1Ndxyu.png)
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/fnF52gd.png)
it's a 12 min travelogue of shakespeare's birthplace, not sure how interesting that is. the bfi have a digital scan of his 1923 comin' thro' the rye, and 1921 tansy, which were available at certain uk specific sites until covid and now there are 'currently no plans to make available outside london, sorry', when it's cheaper for me to get to paris right now than london. am currently very pissed off with the bfi, should call it london film institute, seeing how little it serves the majority of the country. rant over.
Maybe it was really successful merchandising? I just saw Cobra, and there were title cards devoted to selling the idea of how desirable and "magnificent" he was. (Well, maybe only one title card...
The transition to the new technology, however, did not take place without resistance. One of the most prominent public intellectuals of the period Pavlos Nirvanas, who wrote the script for Gaziadis’ The Storm and Astero and who had a persistent interest in cinema, declared in frustration:
The characters in [silent] films not only talk but they talk in a special way. First, they don’t say nonsense, as do for example characters in the theater. Further, they never babble on about useless issues, they don’t exhibit stupid wit, don’t make gross jokes, and don’t shout out stupidities under the pretense of philosophizing. And yet, they communicate with each other perfectly . . . Watch two lovers on the screen: you think that they speak the language of angels never heard before by human ears. When the screen takes on the responsibility of informing us in writing about what they say to each other, the viewer is taken over by disgust. For this reason, the worse a movie is the more written text it presents us with. The best movie is the one which contains the fewest possible written expressions and lets us communicate without mediation with its heroes.
visualtraining wrote: ↑Thu May 25, 2023 6:59 pm Wow everyone has been watching so many good silents while I've been gone! I myself recently watched Kult Ciala (1930) which made for a hazily evocative midnight viewing experience, though the rip was quite pixelated and generally of low quality. The love triangle story was very Lubitsch (without the humor) and the execution was very Gustav Machaty (in a diluted way). The film is worth a look but only if you're running out of erotic melodrama silents to watch, imo (if that's even possible).
I also watched these lovely fragments of Bertini and Menichelli films last night. I especially liked Mariute! La Bertini's face...always a sight to behold.
Also I'm kind of sad you guys don't like Rudolph Valentino / his films ;__; He's close to my heart as one of the first movie stars I loved when I was getting into silents and classic Hollywood as a young teenager. One of my most precious cinema-related memories is being given a little flipbook of frames from The Eagle, showing him dancing, when I was 13, at the San Francisco Silent Film Festival. Cobra is literally my favorite movie of his! I think he and Nita Naldi are absolutely smoldering in it...so beautiful. I plan to rewatch soon. I also find Valentino fascinating as the embodiment of 1920s orientalist fantasy. There's a lot to unpack there.
Sally thanks so much for the longer version / extra material from Mariute! Had no idea that existed; will definitely be watching soon + looking at the higher quality tinted fragment again. Anything to get a better idea of a film of La Bertini's.sally wrote: ↑Thu May 25, 2023 8:31 pm and dammit i wish all the italian archives would coalesce in a meaningful way....i have a mariute bookmarked to watch, it's 28 mins compared to above (looks like the above is the last 10 mins of this one) and is much crappier quality and not coloured. maybe i'll watch the crappy version up to the beginning of the nice one and then switch over
i really like this movie even though i think everything you are saying about it completely correct. there is something i find deeply fun about roland west, a combination of naive enthusiasm and pretty decent budgets (the sets are always great) and...eccentric ideas about narrative emphasis and pace that feels pretty singular.