SCFZ poll: Nicolas Roeg

User avatar
flip
Posts: 3472
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2018 7:07 am
Location: montreal

SCFZ poll: Nicolas Roeg

Post by flip »

Polling the films of director Nicolas Roeg

The rules:

- your list can include no more than half of the Roeg films you've seen, up to a maximum of 5. So if you've seen seven of his films, for example, you can list only a top 3. It's only if you've seen ten or more of his films than you can list the maximum of five.

- i'll assume ballots are ranked unless you tell me otherwise. unranked ballots are fine.

- deadline for ballots: next Tuesday, in seven days, whatever day that is

- if anyone is watching films for these polls, then i'll extend the deadline up to three days, if someone requests an extension

- next poll: whoever posts the first ballot in this thread is free to nominate the director we poll next, unless you've nominated in this round already (everyone should get a chance). Already nominated this round: greg x, umbugbene, roscoe, bure, greennui, wba, brian d, mesnalty, ofrene, st gloede, john ryan, holymanm, oscarwerner, liquidnature, mrcarmady, monsignor arkadin

umbugbene created an index on letterboxd of all of our previous polls here: letterboxd.com/umbugbene/list/index-of-all-scfz-director-polls/

one rule for nominees: at least 3 scfzers need to have seen 10+ of a nominee's films, or at least 4 scfzers need to have seen at least 8 of the nom's films, so if it isn't clear if that will be the case, we'll confirm that's true before moving forward

if 24 hours pass after a poll opens, and no one eligible to nominate has posted a ballot, then i'll nominate someone, and then we'll start over, and everyone will be able to nominate again
User avatar
flip
Posts: 3472
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2018 7:07 am
Location: montreal

Post by flip »

Don't Look Now
Bad Timing
Walkabout
Performance

seen nine
User avatar
MrCarmady
Posts: 904
Joined: Mon Feb 10, 2020 11:14 am
Location: Berlin

Post by MrCarmady »

Only seen one (Performance, good) so can't vote, but will try to watch one or two before the deadline. Surprised he hasn't been polled yet!
"...have you actually seen any movies?" ~ DT
:lboxd: ICM
User avatar
Evelyn Library P.I.
Posts: 1370
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2018 10:36 pm

Post by Evelyn Library P.I. »

1. Insignificance

seen 2
User avatar
greennui
Posts: 2212
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 5:00 pm
Location: Sweden

Post by greennui »

6.

Bad Timing
The Man Who Fell to Earth
Performance
User avatar
nrh
Posts: 1682
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 2:04 pm

Post by nrh »

the man who fell to earth
eureka
don't look now
bad timing
insignificance
User avatar
Monsieur Arkadin
Posts: 423
Joined: Mon May 27, 2019 5:56 pm

Post by Monsieur Arkadin »

Seen 7 at the moment. I'll watch some more, especially Eureka which I've been genuinely intrigued by for a while.
As an aside...I always kind of think of Petulia as Roeg, maybe foolishly out of my ignorance of the rest of Lester's filmography, but it feels so much like his spirit is haunting that film.

I recently re-watched Bad Timing, and was again stunned by his ability to stage scenes across space and time. I haven't read his book, but I certainly hope he wrote a chapter on the love scene from L'Atalante and Alain Resnais in general. But Roeg definitely took this style into a distinctive new category that is really lovely. I re-fall in love with his films every time I watch them.

My preliminary list would be:
-Don't Look Now
-Bad Timing
-Insignificance


But I'm only leaving the others I've seen off the list because of the quota. They've all been legitimately mesmerizing (with, maybe, the exception of The Witches)

Updated:
Seen 9
-Don't Look Now
-Bad Timing
-Insignificance
-The Man Who Fell To Earth
Last edited by Monsieur Arkadin on Sun May 10, 2020 2:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
nrh
Posts: 1682
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 2:04 pm

Post by nrh »

Monsignor Arkadin wrote: Tue May 05, 2020 4:48 pm As an aside...I always kind of think of Petulia as Roeg, maybe foolishly out of my ignorance of the rest of Lester's filmography, but it feels so much like his spirit is haunting that film.
i thought that when i first saw petulia years ago but watching it again this year it's definitely not the case - the obsessive background/foreground contrasts that underlie the whole film are totally lester and don't really appear anywhere in roeg filmography, and the flashforward/stutter edits were actually suggested by editor not lester or roeg. but i also think performance is much more donald cammell than it is roeg.

weirdly i think roeg has much more influence on way to the forum (which somehow reminds me of masque of the red death).
---
Site Admin
Posts: 2136
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 1:30 am

Post by --- »

Seen 3

The man who fell to earth
User avatar
brian d
Posts: 790
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 6:00 am

Post by brian d »

seen 10

walkabout
don't look now
glastonbury fayre
eureka
bad timing
"Most esteemed biographer of Peter Barrington Hutton"
User avatar
Caracortada
Posts: 106
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:38 pm

Post by Caracortada »

Seen 11. Two films stand out.

1. Don't Look Now
2. Walkabout
3. Performance
4. Bad Timing
5. Castaway

Worst: The Witches or How to Ruin a Roald Dahl adaptation.
User avatar
john ryan
Posts: 397
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2018 3:24 am

Post by john ryan »

Seen 10

1. Walkabout
2. Don't Look Now
3. Eureka
4. Insignificance
5. The Man Who Fell to Earth
Last edited by john ryan on Tue May 05, 2020 8:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
:lboxd:
User avatar
rischka
Posts: 6586
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 3:43 am
Location: desert usa
Contact:

Post by rischka »

walkabout
the man who fell to earth
performance

Image
:lboxd: + ICM + :imdb:

ANTIFA 4-EVA

CAUTION: woman having opinions
mesnalty
Posts: 512
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:36 am

Post by mesnalty »

Seen 4:

1. Walkabout
2. The Man Who Fell to Earth
User avatar
flip
Posts: 3472
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2018 7:07 am
Location: montreal

Post by flip »

Caracortada wrote: Tue May 05, 2020 6:20 pm Worst: The Witches or How to Ruin a Roald Dahl adaptation.
I haven't seen The Witches, but The Sound of Claudia Schiffer might be the worst thing I've ever seen.

I've seen Roeg's first seven features, then only two later works, and I'm curious if there's anything worthwhile in his later period (1990 onwards).
User avatar
oscarwerner
Posts: 319
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2019 9:13 am
Contact:

Post by oscarwerner »

Seen 7.
1. Don't Look Now (1973)
2. Walkabout (1971)
3. The Man Who Fell to Earth (1976)
User avatar
Roscoe
Posts: 784
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:29 am
Location: New York

Post by Roscoe »

1. DON'T LOOK NOW
2. WALKABOUT
3. PERFORMANCE

That's about right. Seen enough to rate more.
These matters are best disposed of from a great height. Over water.
User avatar
nrh
Posts: 1682
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 2:04 pm

Post by nrh »

flip wrote: Tue May 05, 2020 6:56 pm I haven't seen The Witches, but The Sound of Claudia Schiffer might be the worst thing I've ever seen.

I've seen Roeg's first seven features, then only two later works, and I'm curious if there's anything worthwhile in his later period (1990 onwards).
there are some genuine great sequences in the witches, and a terrific angelica huston performance, and i'll always be fond of the film for traumatizing a whole bunch of children during my brief and ill-advised tenure as after school teacher way out in the far regions of queens.

but i've been (morbidly?) curious about the later works too...i've seen claudia schiffer and remember it being kind of awful.
User avatar
Monsieur Arkadin
Posts: 423
Joined: Mon May 27, 2019 5:56 pm

Post by Monsieur Arkadin »

I too have some positive feelings towards The Witches... largely as one of the children it traumatized in the early 90s. (I'm a firm believer that the best children films have 1 scene that push the limits of what they can handle.... just a little bit too far.)
User avatar
St. Gloede
Posts: 712
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2019 5:50 pm

Post by St. Gloede »

Only seen 6:

Walkabout
The Man Who Fell to Earth
Performance
User avatar
Holymanm
Posts: 623
Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2020 11:29 am
Location: Vancouver

Post by Holymanm »

Walkabout

Seen 5

Not a fan... but Walkabout is great
User avatar
ofrene
Posts: 630
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2018 3:04 pm
Location: south korea

Post by ofrene »

seen 2

Don't Look Now
:lboxd:
User avatar
john ryan
Posts: 397
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2018 3:24 am

Post by john ryan »

nrh wrote: Tue May 05, 2020 7:29 pm
but i've been (morbidly?) curious about the later works too...i've seen claudia schiffer and remember it being kind of awful.
I watched his 1989 adaptation of Sweet Bird of Youth earlier today. I'm nervous about continuing further.
:lboxd:
User avatar
...
Posts: 1234
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 6:50 am

Post by ... »

Don't Look Now
The Man Who Fell to Earth
Performance
Insignificance
Walkabout

Seen 13 Roegs, used to think he was a big deal back in the 80s, but my enthusiasm waned considerably over time as Roeg started to seem more superficially inventive than really meaningful. Don't Look Now is the one that seems most fully realized. Man Who Fell to Earth is at least suitably alien in a singular, somewhat muddled way. Performance is, as NRH suggested, maybe more a Cammell movie, but like Man, fit to its subject well enough. Walkabout has an impressive enough tone and look, but feels rather too self satisfied, simplistic, and leering to take more seriously and Insignificance worked well enough for its play into film way.

Roeg's fascination with sexual politics isn't all that compelling to me, but at least he's upfront about it, which is something I guess, when many directors prefer to try and hide their pleasures under a scrim of genre or whatnot. His handling of actors wasn't always great, but it was often interesting save for his otherwise admirable devotion to casting his wife perhaps. I'll Theresa Russell credit for her daring in how she approaches her roles, but she's really not very good with dialogue, having an extremely limited range in delivery flattening the affect of almost every character she plays. Still, Roeg made a lot of interesting choices in the stories he chose to film, back when he had options, was willing to be adventurous, and did try to push his movies to being something different than most, so I can respect that.
User avatar
flip
Posts: 3472
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2018 7:07 am
Location: montreal

Post by flip »

Evelyn Library P.I. wrote: Tue May 05, 2020 4:10 pm seen 2
evelyn, you can pick our next director if you like!
User avatar
Evelyn Library P.I.
Posts: 1370
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2018 10:36 pm

Post by Evelyn Library P.I. »

flip wrote: Wed May 06, 2020 1:56 pm evelyn, you can pick our next director if you like!
yay! let's see... how about Roy Del Ruth? (I've seen 12.)
If he doesn't work, then maybe Joseph H. Lewis (11) or W.K.L Dickson (45).
User avatar
flip
Posts: 3472
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2018 7:07 am
Location: montreal

Post by flip »

probably best to check views on those, but i'm sure one of them will work. i've seen 8 lewis, 5 dickson, but only one del ruth
User avatar
greennui
Posts: 2212
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 5:00 pm
Location: Sweden

Post by greennui »

I have 31 Dickson, not enough for the others.
User avatar
Umbugbene
Posts: 720
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 7:41 am
Location: Quezon City

Post by Umbugbene »

I have 6 Del Ruth, 4 Lewis, and 4 Dickson.

Also 7 Roeg, but I don't recall them well enough to vote.
User avatar
...
Posts: 1234
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 6:50 am

Post by ... »

20 del Ruths, not enough Lewiss to matter, and more than enough Dicksons
Last edited by ... on Wed May 06, 2020 6:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply