![Image](https://i.imgur.com/Hitp210.png)
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/ka4j7DL.png)
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/2VfmNC8.png)
restored al-mummia, thx marty!!
![Cool 8-)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
Hill declined earlier than Carp. Carp made some interesting films in the 90's like In The Mouth of Madness etc, and even Escape From LA is good campy fun.wba wrote: ↑Thu Apr 09, 2020 9:02 amPS: Carpenter also made incredible films between 1975 and 1982 (roughly in the same period as Hill - though I dislike Dark Star and therefore left it out). It's sad to see how both their careers gradually declined though (declined, because they basically started with a string of startling masterpieces and therefore from an incredibly high point). But compared with many other US filmmakers from the 80s and 90s and 2000s, they still made (some) great stuff, of course.
Yes. It just becomes more obvious with time that most of the so called 'mavericks' of New Hollywood were quasi, if not outright, traditionalists with a slightly askew view. Cimino is such an odd case though. Not sure how he fell off so dramatically after making The Deer Hunter and Heaven's Gate, which, to me, despite their flaws, are pretty monumental pieces of contemporary American film making. I'm sure his confidence took a hit after Heaven's Gate bombed and destroyed UA, but Year of The Dragon also had moments of brilliance. After that, his career was a complete wash. I know some people defend The Silician, Desperate Hours etc, but to me those films are very weak and not a patch on what he did in the late 70's/early 80's when he seemed poised to be the next great American director.wba wrote: ↑Thu Apr 09, 2020 9:02 amBoth would have surely been even more outstanding, and might have had a better career towards their "end", if they had worked in the old studio system: imagine Hill and Carp making films in the 30s, 40s and 50s (and maybe even the 60s)!
It's a bit as with many other directors of roughly that generation (e.g. Coppola, Cimino, Milius, etc.).
if i remember correctly boiling point is the film where kitano said he found himself as a director, because he had to basically create it in the editing. which i think opens up an interesting way to look at him as a director overall.Joks Trois wrote: ↑Fri Apr 10, 2020 9:45 am Boiling Point (Ktaino): rewatch. Not quite as refined as Sonatine, but his style was fully formed at this point on his second feature. Some startling scenes, including one of the best action scenes of the 90's in a small cramped office, as well as great associational editing and use of dissolve. 7.5/10
Same, except more like 8-9 years. It was upgraded and freeleeched on Black Crow, so I took advantage. It holds the fuck up. Need to see more of his other stuff, only seen 6.
the version on kg (converted from pal to ntsc) is about 85 minutes, the original dvd copy is 83
Okay thanks for that. I'll take it to mean lb/imdb are wrong. Good to know... I'll rewatch it soon!