Last Watched

Joks Trois
Posts: 361
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2018 9:51 am

Re: Last Watched

Post by Joks Trois »

Salt and Fire: Does Herzog want us to take this crap seriously? Easily one of his worst films that simply prolongs his narrative losing streak. Bad acting, bad dialogue, and a waste of a good location in the second half. 3.5/10
User avatar
kanafani
Posts: 1606
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 12:08 pm
Contact:

Post by kanafani »

High Life. Quite a disappointment. Some of it feels like it was guest-directed by Lars von Trier. The 'fuck-bot' scene... WTF, Claire?
User avatar
liquidnature
Posts: 556
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 3:44 am

Post by liquidnature »

John Wick: Chapter 3 - Parabellum

Did not disappoint, as far as John Wick movies go. So fun. :cowboy:
:lboxd:
User avatar
rischka
Posts: 6578
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 3:43 am
Location: desert usa
Contact:

Post by rischka »

wow house of bamboo. i dunno why i was under the impression this wasn't good. because it was! esp the amusement park scenes

Image

sorry sam i shoulda had more faith in you. also has the same plot as point break :lol:
Last edited by rischka on Sat Aug 17, 2019 9:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
:lboxd: + ICM + :imdb:

ANTIFA 4-EVA

CAUTION: woman having opinions
User avatar
Roscoe
Posts: 784
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:29 am
Location: New York

Post by Roscoe »

APOCALYPSE NOW FINAL CUT on a Big Screen, Brainsmash Sound -- the good stuff still works, for me at least. Good to see that Coppola has come to his senses about at least two of those scenes added for REDUX (that dreadful Playboy Bunny sequence in particular) as they are gone without trace and good riddance. Alas, that Plantation scene is still there, complete with what has to be among the very worst bits of dated electronic music score cheese in film history. I suspect that future viewings will be limited to the Original Release version.
These matters are best disposed of from a great height. Over water.
User avatar
rischka
Posts: 6578
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 3:43 am
Location: desert usa
Contact:

Post by rischka »

Storm Warning by stuart heisler. really dumb KKK movie with ronnie reagan (not as a klansman sadly), ginger rogers and a very naive doris day.

Image

DORIS. your husband is in the KLAN. he MURDERED someone. then he tried to rape your sister. he's not secretly a nice guy. also your son is hanging with charlie manson

saw a couple of black extras in one shot but it's never explained exactly what the klan does, aside from 'a lot of good around here' with perhaps some financial improprieties

Image
:lboxd: + ICM + :imdb:

ANTIFA 4-EVA

CAUTION: woman having opinions
User avatar
vaka
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu May 23, 2019 9:19 pm

Post by vaka »

I watched Parasite last night and I liked it, however, I woke up this morning not sure if I really do!
Image
User avatar
Evelyn Library P.I.
Posts: 1370
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2018 10:36 pm

Post by Evelyn Library P.I. »

Arizona Cyclone (dir. Joseph H. Lewis, 1941)

Curious to explore more Joseph H. Lewis. Checked out one of his early B westerns. It's interesting to see his strategies for heightening visual interest. His main approach here appears to be placing objects in the foreground to produce a more compelling image. I expect I'll be watching more mediocre Johnny Mack Brown westerns this August, especially the ones with cowgal style icon Nell O'Day. And more Lewis, too.

Image
Image
Image
User avatar
nrh
Posts: 1681
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 2:04 pm

Post by nrh »

tea and sympathy, on a faded but still lovely print at metrograph. what a film, seems stranger and stranger the more i see it - this time realizing i'm now much closer in age to the adult characters than i am to the adolescent ones...
User avatar
Roscoe
Posts: 784
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:29 am
Location: New York

Post by Roscoe »

A REPORT ON THE PARTY AND GUESTS -- a tasty bit of Czech New Wave paranoia, a tightly packed 70 minutes of Bunuelian fun, but with a cooler, less confrontational vibe to it. Looking forward to checking out more in that Eclipse PEARLS OF THE CZECH NEW WAVE box.
These matters are best disposed of from a great height. Over water.
User avatar
thoxans
Posts: 1350
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 7:48 pm

Post by thoxans »

the whole shootin' match (eagle pennell) just might be one of my new fav films. thx to all who rec it!
User avatar
Evelyn Library P.I.
Posts: 1370
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2018 10:36 pm

Post by Evelyn Library P.I. »

Been diving into the Western genre lately ⁠— some recent pleasures:

The Silver Bullet (dir. Joseph H. Lewis, 1942) — Another Johnny Mack Brown programmer western directed by J.H. Lewis. More notable here, though, is the screenplay by Elizabeth Beecher. This one is downright feminist! Johnny Mack Brown acts as campaign manager for a character named Emily Morgan who is running to be her state's first woman senator ("It's about time women took a hand in politics"). Recommended.

Image

Wagon Tracks (prod. William S. Hart and Thomas Ince, 1919) — Extremely handsome silent western, one of the most compelling I've yet seen. Top-tier production values, moving acting from William S. Hunk and Jane Novak, and heart-tugging interpersonal stories of love and family. The use of lighting is a particular standout, aided by fine tinting and buttressed by well illustrated intertitles.

Image Image

Soft Shoes (prod. Hunt Stromberg, 1925) — Instant fav genre mashup (western, urban crime). Cowboy Harry Carey goes to San Francisco and falls in (love) with badass style icon cat burglar Lillian Rich. A brisk 45 minutes, jampacked with action and laughs. Find this on the National Film Preservation Foundation website.

Image
User avatar
Roscoe
Posts: 784
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:29 am
Location: New York

Post by Roscoe »

Check out HELL'S HINGES, a tasty silent Western that gets downright apocalyptic.
These matters are best disposed of from a great height. Over water.
User avatar
Evelyn Library P.I.
Posts: 1370
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2018 10:36 pm

Post by Evelyn Library P.I. »

Roscoe wrote: Wed Aug 21, 2019 1:52 pm Check out HELL'S HINGES, a tasty silent Western that gets downright apocalyptic.
Yeah, I watched Hell's Hinges a year or so ago, that's the only other Hart I've seen. It's pretty staggeringly well-made, I recall being impressed. I'd say I liked Wagon Tracks better, though, since Hell's Hinges has a rather offensively vengeful thematic core. Wagon Tracks is interesting for being a more complex treatment of revenge and justice, with perhaps some implicit critique of the mean streak in Hell's Hinges. Would do well to rewatch Hell's Hinges to confirm all this, mind you.
User avatar
liquidnature
Posts: 556
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 3:44 am

Post by liquidnature »

Watched the Terminator franchise (all first time viewings) over the past few weeks. Not a series I thought I would enjoy going into it, but the first two films stole my heart, and the third and fourth installments were decent fun and at least had some of the soul of the originals. Genisys should be avoided at all costs.

ranked:
Terminator 2: Judgement Day
The Terminator
Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
Terminator Salvation

...

arnold taking a poop

...

Terminator Genisys
:lboxd:
User avatar
pabs
Posts: 1084
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 5:18 am
Contact:

Post by pabs »

Interview with the Vampire (Jordan, 1994)

The script was bad, both dialogue and story. I wonder if the book it was based on was just fashionable at the time and only good for way back then? The whole thing was completely tedious. I'd drive a stake through the heart of Tom Cruise and Brad Pitt if I could.

4/10
User avatar
rischka
Posts: 6578
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 3:43 am
Location: desert usa
Contact:

Post by rischka »

lol i read some of those books and yeah :lol: i finished baahubali and my fave part was the fabulous flying ship sequence!!

Image

Image

fave musical number too 8-)

Image

Image

re terminator: still love the first one most of all. haven't seen the last two and don't intend to watch any others...but i did see lady terminator which was kind of hilarious :D
:lboxd: + ICM + :imdb:

ANTIFA 4-EVA

CAUTION: woman having opinions
User avatar
liquidnature
Posts: 556
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 3:44 am

Post by liquidnature »

rischka wrote: Thu Aug 22, 2019 3:56 pmbaahubali
I'll admit I have a hard time getting into Indian cinema and/or culture for whatever reason, but this looks awesome.
:lboxd:
User avatar
rischka
Posts: 6578
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 3:43 am
Location: desert usa
Contact:

Post by rischka »

for whatever reason, A LOT of film lovers have that problem. popular indian films are a joke on many forums. it is SAD

i used to only watch third cinema too. i think people here have influenced me greatly. TY PEOPLE :D

i have been to india, only briefly, and always been fascinated with it so that doesn't hurt

it's as crazy and fun as hong kong cinema ever was and people who don't give it a chance are missing out

anyways you can try the first part on youtube until it gets taken down

edit: thinking about this some more, i think the music was a stumbling block i overcame by being surrounded with it in india. it remains the only place i've travelled that wasn't dominated by american pop. and wba showing yaadon ki baraat in the cup was a turning point!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bu2IJ3c5R7k
:lboxd: + ICM + :imdb:

ANTIFA 4-EVA

CAUTION: woman having opinions
User avatar
ofrene
Posts: 629
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2018 3:04 pm
Location: south korea

Post by ofrene »

Watching Thunder Road(Jim Cummings) on the plane and really really really really hate that last 10 minute. Jim Cummings's acting is good but his writing and direction... i dunno...
:lboxd:
Joks Trois
Posts: 361
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2018 9:51 am

Post by Joks Trois »

pabs wrote: Thu Aug 22, 2019 2:08 pm Interview with the Vampire (Jordan, 1994)

The script was bad, both dialogue and story. I wonder if the book it was based on was just fashionable at the time and only good for way back then? The whole thing was completely tedious. I'd drive a stake through the heart of Tom Cruise and Brad Pitt if I could.

4/10
Yes, Anne Rice's success was all about timing. She was a novelty for a while, or at least her vampire books were, and the whole goth thing was big in the 90's, so that definitely helped her. In retrospect, her books were complete junk, but when she became ultra successful in the 90's, it did seem 'right' in a perverse sort of way.

I found the film really dull in 1994, but I didn't mind it when I revisited it on dvd 10 years later. I'm sure I wouldn't like it much now though.


Monsieur Verdoux: Not convinced that it's a masterpiece, but it is an interesting, even daring, black comedy from a celebrity who wanted to challenge preconceptions about his image. He didn't go as far with the concept as I would have liked, but it's pretty well done, and it feels more 'cinematic', for lack of a better word, than The Great Dictator, in the sense that the camera work is more fluid.
User avatar
Roscoe
Posts: 784
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:29 am
Location: New York

Post by Roscoe »

pabs wrote: Thu Aug 22, 2019 2:08 pm Interview with the Vampire (Jordan, 1994)

The script was bad, both dialogue and story. I wonder if the book it was based on was just fashionable at the time and only good for way back then? The whole thing was completely tedious. I'd drive a stake through the heart of Tom Cruise and Brad Pitt if I could.

4/10
The film is particularly hamstrung by poor old Pitt's inability to project intelligence or to deliver a line of dialogue more complex than "coffee, please." There's plenty of blame to go round, though -- a lot of it goes to the hairdressers. Poor old Banderas comes off like Maria Montez here -- "I yam the Owldest Auf The Fampyresssssssssss!" is the "Gif me the Cobra Jool" of the 1990s. Cruise gives it his best shot, as Lestat gives him the chance to show the assholisness that always lurks under his persona, and he gets the film's best and only laugh, when he chastises Kirsten Dunst for being a "very naughty girl!"

Some cool sets, though. And a few lovely moments of Stephen Rea projecting exactly what Pitt cannot -- a functioning IQ. Can't speak for the books, which I've always found entirely unreadable.
These matters are best disposed of from a great height. Over water.
Joks Trois
Posts: 361
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2018 9:51 am

Post by Joks Trois »

The Man Who Killed Don Quixote: Gilliam needs to retire. He is done. The Fellini comparisons are completely off because no matter how shambolic and disjointed his narratives became in late career, he always compensated with interesting set pieces. This is even true of Voice of The Moon. This film has nothing. Pryce is good, but he has f%#k all to work with, and the film is visually uninteresting. 4.5/10.

I'm watching Aladdin (2019) now. The sad thing is that I'm enjoying it more than the Gilliam.
User avatar
Roscoe
Posts: 784
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:29 am
Location: New York

Post by Roscoe »

Joks Trois wrote: Sat Aug 24, 2019 12:29 pm The Man Who Killed Don Quixote: Gilliam needs to retire. He is done. The Fellini comparisons are completely off because no matter how shambolic and disjointed his narratives became in late career, he always compensated with interesting set pieces. This is even true of Voice of The Moon. This film has nothing. Pryce is good, but he has f%#k all to work with, and the film is visually uninteresting. 4.5/10.

I'm watching Aladdin (2019) now. The sad thing is that I'm enjoying it more than the Gilliam.
Yeah, poor old QUIXOTE, not since Fincher remade FORREST GUMP and called it BENJAMIN BUTTON has someone spent so much time on such a pointless remake. I found some glimmers of the Gilliam magic, but the tired FISHER KINGiness of the enterprise can't help but disappoint. I did like the trip to the moon though.

ALADDIN -- yeah, uh, no. There's just no reason for me to put myself through that.
These matters are best disposed of from a great height. Over water.
User avatar
Roscoe
Posts: 784
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:29 am
Location: New York

Post by Roscoe »

THE MAGICIAN 4/10 -- Rex Ingram tosses a batch of cliches onscreen, tosses some bargain basement German Expressionist schlock into the mix, and voila. Pure crap, interesting mainly for what it borrows from and what borrowed from it. You needn't bother to seek it out.
These matters are best disposed of from a great height. Over water.
User avatar
rischka
Posts: 6578
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 3:43 am
Location: desert usa
Contact:

Post by rischka »

watched the beautiful pauwels film essay from 2010

Image

commonly known as film reves or 'dreaming film,' a wide ranging 3 hours on cinema, dreams and explorations real and imaginary. or both. if you've seen the director's 'letter from a filmmaker to his daughter' you'll know what to expect. somewhere between marker and mekas

Image

Image
:lboxd: + ICM + :imdb:

ANTIFA 4-EVA

CAUTION: woman having opinions
User avatar
sally
Posts: 3603
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 8:11 pm

Post by sally »

i'm only watching silents these days, so i've lost the ability to tell what's gorgeous (they all are) or misogynist (ditto?) any more, but is full frontal female nudity normal by 1929? my raised eyebrow was one of the less hairy things present

la femme et le pantin (baroncelli 1929)

before the full reveal
Image

and i loved this shot from inside a guitar
Image
User avatar
rischka
Posts: 6578
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 3:43 am
Location: desert usa
Contact:

Post by rischka »

OMG SALLY i thought i was on the wrong page!
:lboxd: + ICM + :imdb:

ANTIFA 4-EVA

CAUTION: woman having opinions
User avatar
sally
Posts: 3603
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 8:11 pm

Post by sally »

why? am i? are there conventions i've forgotten? or have you invented a SILENT PLEASE thread somewhere?
User avatar
rischka
Posts: 6578
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 3:43 am
Location: desert usa
Contact:

Post by rischka »

i just mean i haven't seen you round these parts in a long while. an excellent surprise :drinking:
:lboxd: + ICM + :imdb:

ANTIFA 4-EVA

CAUTION: woman having opinions
Post Reply